Re: Performance of query
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Performance of query |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 514CC98E.4050903@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Performance of query (Cindy Makarowsky <cindymakarowsky@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Performance of query
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 03/22/2013 12:46 PM, Cindy Makarowsky wrote: > I've tried playing around with the settings in the config file for > shared_buffers, work_mem, etc restarting Postgres each time and nothing > seems to help. Well, you're summarizing 55 million rows on an unindexed table: " -> Seq Scan on busbase (cost=0.00..6378172.28 rows=55402728 width=7) (actual time=0.004..250046.673 rows=60057057 loops=1)" ... that's where your time is going. My only suggestion would be to create a composite index which matches the group by condition on table1, and vacuum freeze the whole table so that you can use index-only scan on 9.2. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: