Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review]
От | Greg Smith |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 514B5A08.3030306@2ndQuadrant.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be changed via SQL [review] (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Proposal for Allow postgresql.conf values to be
changed via SQL [review]
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 3/21/13 2:38 PM, Robert Haas wrote: > Also, while I think that MOST people will probably want a SIGHUP right > after SET PERSISTENT, I am not sure that EVERYONE will want that. If > you want it and it doesn't happen automatically, you can always do it > by hand. This is a fair position, and since that's how the feature as written right now works that helps. I think proceeding this way needs to hand some sort of hint back to the user though, telling them the change isn't active until SIGHUP. The path I don't want to see if where someone uses SET PERSISTENT and can't figure out why nothing changed. It should be as obvious as we can make it to someone that the explicit reload is necessary. -- Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant US greg@2ndQuadrant.com Baltimore, MD PostgreSQL Training, Services, and 24x7 Support www.2ndQuadrant.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: