Re: The First Digit WAS: The case for version number inflation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Josh Berkus
Тема Re: The First Digit WAS: The case for version number inflation
Дата
Msg-id 513E1F30.80303@agliodbs.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: The case for version number inflation  (Chris Travers <chris.travers@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-advocacy
> I am fine with our current versioning system and I think it works to our
> advantage.  However I do think we could use some extra effort to make sure
> we are on the same page regarding what these numbers mean.

Yes.  Per my previous email, we have always incremented the first digit
because of major features which changed PostgreSQL's position in the
marketplace.  As a PG advocacy geek, I'm reluctant to give that up; the
publicity around 9.0 really did give Postgres adoption a boost, and I
think we can make as much hay out of 10.0.

Personally, I'm thinking that we're more likely to have a 10.0 than a 9.4.

BTW, I'd say this thread has pretty much shot down any idea of changing
our version numbering system.

--
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com


В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Darren Duncan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: The case for version number inflation
Следующее
От: Joshua Kramer
Дата:
Сообщение: Postgres vs. SQL Server on Reddit