Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5138.1217945839@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parsing of pg_hba.conf and authentication inconsistencies
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes: > Should I read this as you warming up slightly to the idea of having the > postmaster do that? ;-) No ;-). I still think that a "postgres --check-config" feature would be far more complete and useful, as well as less likely to cause bugs in critical code paths. A point that I don't think has been made so far in the thread: the only place the postmaster could complain in event of problems is the postmaster log, which we know too well isn't watched by inexperienced DBAs. I guarantee you that we will get bug reports along the lines of "I updated pg_hba.conf and did pg_ctl reload, but nothing changed! Postgres sucks!" if we implement checking at load time. I think one of the main advantages of a --check-config approach is that whatever it had to say would come out on the user's terminal. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: