Re: The case for version number inflation
От | Joshua D. Drake |
---|---|
Тема | Re: The case for version number inflation |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 512F8D5F.5070303@commandprompt.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: The case for version number inflation (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
On 02/28/2013 08:53 AM, Dave Page wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 11:02 PM, Gavin Flower > <GavinFlower@archidevsys.co.nz> wrote: >> >> I hate the Firefox versioning system that they currently use! > > Yeah, I've heard loads of complaints about that. > >> Try educating Amazon. You _DO_ have a baseball bat? > > I know where you can get one... > To be honest, this is a non problem. As has been said a millions times before, we will never make everyone happy. If we start inflating our numbers, they numbers start to mean less. Consider that Oracle, is only at 11. Microsoft uses years to represent their product. Informix doesn't appear to use any numbers anymore opting for Ultimate Warehouse Edition and "Choice" edition We aren't a marketing team. Best we can do is educate and let those who don't bother to be educated, stay ignorant. JD -- Command Prompt, Inc. - http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Support, Training, Professional Services and Development High Availability, Oracle Conversion, Postgres-XC @cmdpromptinc - 509-416-6579
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: