Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
От | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 512E60B5.8020707@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: Strange Windows problem, lock_timeout test request
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2013-02-27 20:06 keltezéssel, Stephen Frost írta: > Zoltan, > > * Boszormenyi Zoltan (zb@cybertec.at) wrote: >> If we get rid of the per-statement variant, there is no need for that either. > For my 2c, I didn't see Tom's comments as saying that we shouldn't have > that capability, just that the implementation was ugly. :) But I am happy to drop it. ;-) > That said, perhaps we should just drop it for now, get the lock_timeout > piece solid, and then come back to the question about lock_timeout_stmt. OK, let's do it this way. > > Thanks, > > Stephen -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: