Re: BUG #7819: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1235919 in pg_toast_35328
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: BUG #7819: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1235919 in pg_toast_35328 |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5120.1358914486@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: BUG #7819: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1235919 in pg_toast_35328 (Pius Chan <pchan@contigo.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: BUG #7819: missing chunk number 0 for toast value
1235919 in pg_toast_35328
Re: BUG #7819: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1235919 in pg_toast_35328 |
Список | pgsql-bugs |
Pius Chan <pchan@contigo.com> writes: > Hi Tom, > Yes, we start seeing this ERROR after upgrade to 9.1.7. The ERROR is from the "cluster jms_messages" command. Last night,the ERROR happened three times: > (1) at 00:20:01 > ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1239124 in pg_toast_35328 > (2) at 00:25:01 > ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1239124 in pg_toast_35328 > (3) at 00:35:01 > ERROR: missing chunk number 0 for toast value 1241022 in pg_toast_35328 > The "cluster jms_messages" runs every 5 minutes. However, so far, it seems that the ERROR happens at about mid-night and35328 is the toast area of the "jms_message" table: So what else is this application doing around midnight? In particular, it seems like something must've happened between 00:15 and 00:20 to create the problem with OID 1239124, and then something else happened between 00:25 and 00:30 to get rid of it. And then a similar sequence happened between 00:30 and 00:40 involving OID 1241022. Most likely the trigger events are application actions against jms_messages, but we have no info about what. (It's also possible that autovacuums of jms_messages are involved, so you might want to crank up your logging enough so you can see those in the postmaster log.) I had first thought that this might have something to do with the toast-value-processing changes we made in CLUSTER a year or so ago, but a look in the commit logs confirms that those patches were in 9.1.3. So I have no idea what might've broken between 9.1.3 and 9.1.7. We need data, or even better an actual test case. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления: