Re: azpug@postgresql.org

On 02/14/2013 10:10 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Stefan Kaltenbrunner wrote:
>> On 02/12/2013 11:19 PM, Joshua D. Drake wrote:
> 
>>>> Mind you, if the list needs modification *anyway*, is there something
>>>> wrong with using ArizonaPUG@postgresql.org?
>>>
>>> That seems a reasonable compromise.
>>
>> yeah - I don't think we should use azpug@ for arizona and shadow an
>> entire country so I would thing that arizonapug@ seems like a sensible
>> alternative
> 
> And how about US-Ariz-pug?  The ISO code for Arizona is US-AZ; we could
> do that too.

no problem with that one either - mostly concerned about polluting the
main ISO country code "space" further (as in azpug@)

> 
> I want something that has gotten at least *some* discussion, thought,
> and agreement, not the first thing that crosses our minds.  It's a name
> that we're going to be stuck with for a long time, because it's damn
> hard to change list names.  I note none of the guys from AZ have
> actually said anything.

yeah - getting feedback from the actual "users" of that list would be
much appreciated



Stefan