Re: [HACKERS] Release cycle length

On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 10:47 PM, Michael Glaesemann wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 18, 2003, at 10:32 PM, Andreas Grabmüller wrote:
>> Have you looked at the apache download site? I think it's goot (of
>> course, we can put the mirror chooser under the download links - it
>> doesn't matter for the functionality as always a different (random?)
>> server gets preselected automatically...
>
> Yes, I did. I thought it was pretty good. Nice and clean. And I like
> how it chooses a server. I don't know how it selects. You could do it
> by location (nearness to the client ip), server load (weight those
> with lower server load). I'm sure there are other ways as well.
>
> I have seen examples where you choose the download, then the server. I
> wish I can think of one right now...

Sourceforge does it the download > server way. Check out
http://awstats.sourceforge.net/#DOWNLOAD

You might have to scroll down a bit. The # link didn't work for me.

Michael