Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 51154497.3000709@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Considering Gerrit for CFs
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 2/8/13 10:58 AM, Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes: >> I suggest, build it and they will come, or not. Let people push their >> patches into Gerrit and attach the reviews to the commit fest items. If >> reviewers then want to use that, it's their choice. We'll see how it goes. > > I might be misunderstanding what you're suggesting here, but it sounds > like this would imply that reviews could end up off in a Gerrit repo > somewhere, never getting posted to the mailing lists at all. That would > make me sad. The list archives are this project's community memory, > and I have every expectation that they'll still be around and useful > when Gerrit is forgotten. I don't object to people using their > tools-of-choice to perform reviewing, but we need some way of making > sure that the reviews get archived. Gerrit sends me an email every times something happens, so I think this is not going to be a problem. What it doesn't support AFAICT is sending emails *in*, but I don't see that as a requirement.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: