Re: Training approval policy on pg.org
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5112AF0E.2090708@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Training approval policy on pg.org (Dave Page <dpage@pgadmin.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Training approval policy on pg.org
|
Список | pgsql-www |
On 01/31/2013 08:03 AM, Dave Page wrote: > Following a quick discussion with Magnus, I've approved all the rest. > It's clear that the vast majority of folks here support allowing much > more training than we currently do, and as it stands, the policy > actually says the moderators may reject more than 4 posts per quarter > at their discretion, i.e. accept by default. Well, more training than we currently do *except for one training provider*. I was just checking, and that provider is still posting. I'd like, as a moderator, to stick to the policy that we reject more than 4 posts per quarter from CertFirst due to the simple reason that, as reported, they cancel/reschedule a high proportion of their trainings. For that matter, if we received a similar report about any other training provider, I think we should follow the same policy. Works for everybody? -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-www по дате отправления: