Re: naming of wal-archives
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: naming of wal-archives |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 510A8406.3010204@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: naming of wal-archives (Neil Worden <nworden1234@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 01/31/2013 01:48 AM, Neil Worden wrote: > > Btw, ps shows: > > > The archiver process says "last was 000000010000006E00000034" and when i > look into my wal-archive-directory i see: > > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 31 10:24 > 000000010000006E00000033 > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 31 10:24 > 000000010000006E00000034 > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 29 16:03 > 000000010000008C0000008E > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 29 16:32 > 000000010000008C0000008F > > The 6E..34 file was just written by the archiver process. But further > down at the same time this file was written: > > ... > -rw------- 1 postgres postgres 16777216 Jan 31 10:24 > 000000010000008E00000054 > > which seems to match the position of the streaming wal-senders . > > Any ideas ? Yes, I think you are going to have to map this out for us. Something like: pg_receivexlog to ? / Machine A (Master) Archiving on ----> /some_archive_dir \ Machine B (standby) \ Machine C (standby) I cannot follow what is going on from the written description. > > Thanks, Neil. -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: