Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Synchronize with imath upstream |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5102.1549207886@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Synchronize with imath upstream (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Synchronize with imath upstream
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes: > The -Wno-declaration-after-statement approach takes eight lines of code, and > the filter-out approach takes one. On the other hand, using $(filter-out) > changes any runs of whitespace to single spaces ("$(filter-out foo,a b c)" > yields "a b c"). We do risk that with CPPFLAGS and LDFLAGS in a few places. > I don't want to proliferate that practice, because it changes semantics of > CFLAGS containing -DFOO="arbitrary text". I don't particularly buy that argument, because CPPFLAGS is where any -D switches ought to be put. So we've already exposed ourselves to this risk, in the unlikely scenario where it's not hypothetical. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: