On 17.01.2013 15:05, Andres Freund wrote:
> On 2013-01-17 13:47:41 +0900, Michael Paquier wrote:
>> I think that bug has been introduced by commit 7fcbf6a.
>> Before splitting xlog reading as a separate facility things worked
>> correctly.
>> There are also no delay problems before this commit.
>
> Ok, my inkling proved to be correct, its two related issues:
>
> a ) The error handling in XLogReadRecord is inconsistent, it doesn't
> always reset the necessary things.
>
> b) ReadRecord: We cannot not break out of the retry loop in readRecord
> just so, just removing the break seems correct.
>
> c) ReadRecord: (minor): We should log an error even if errormsg is not
> set, otherwise we wont jump out far enough.
>
> I think at least a) and b) is the result of merges between development
> of different people, sorry for that.
Got a patch?
- Heikki