Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50F751DA.8000309@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into log (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: review: pgbench - aggregation of info written into
log
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/16/2013 08:05 PM, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: >>> It seems instr_time.h on Windows simply does not provide current >>> timestamp. From pgbench.c: >>> >>> /* >>> * if transaction finished, record the time it took in the log >>> */ >>> if (logfile && commands[st->state + 1] == NULL) >>> { >>> instr_time now; >>> instr_time diff; >>> double usec; >>> >>> INSTR_TIME_SET_CURRENT(now); >>> diff = now; >>> INSTR_TIME_SUBTRACT(diff, st->txn_begin); >>> usec = (double) INSTR_TIME_GET_MICROSEC(diff); >>> >>> #ifndef WIN32 >>> /* This is more than we really ought to know about instr_time */ >>> fprintf(logfile, "%d %d %.0f %d %ld %ld\n", >>> st->id, st->cnt, usec, st->use_file, >>> (long) now.tv_sec, (long) now.tv_usec); >>> #else >>> /* On Windows, instr_time doesn't provide a timestamp anyway */ >>> fprintf(logfile, "%d %d %.0f %d 0 0\n", >>> st->id, st->cnt, usec, st->use_file); >>> #endif >>> } >> >> This might be way more than we want to do, but there is an article >> that describes some techniques for doing what seems to be missing >> (AIUI): >> >> <http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163996.aspx> > Even this would be doable, I'm afraid it may not fit in 9.3 if we > think about the current status of CF. So our choice would be: > > 1) Postpone the patch to 9.4 > > 2) Commit the patch in 9.3 without Windows support > > I personally am ok with #2. We traditionally avoid particular paltform > specific features on PostgreSQL. However I think the policiy could be > losen for contrib staffs. Also pgbench is just a client program. We > could always use pgbench on UNIX/Linux if we truely need the feature. > > What do you think? Fair enough, I was just trying to point out alternatives. We have committed platform-specific features before now. I hope it doesn't just get left like this, though. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: