Re: Parallel query execution
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Parallel query execution |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50F6B3B3.8080505@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Parallel query execution (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Parallel query execution
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/15/2013 11:32 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 01:28:18PM +0900, Michael Paquier wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 1:22 PM, Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com> wrote: >> >> Claudio, Stephen, >> >> It really seems like the areas where we could get the most "bang for the >> buck" in parallelism would be: >> >> 1. Parallel sort >> 2. Parallel aggregation (for commutative aggregates) >> 3. Parallel nested loop join (especially for expression joins, like GIS) >> >> parallel data load? :/ > We have that in pg_restore, and I thinnk we are getting parallel dump in > 9.3, right? Unfortunately, I don't see it in the last 9.3 commit-fest. > Is it still being worked on? > I am about half way through reviewing it. Unfortunately paid work take precedence over unpaid work. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: