Re: Porting to Haiku
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Porting to Haiku |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50F0866C.4090302@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Porting to Haiku ("Mark Hellegers" <mhellege@xs4all.nl>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/11/2013 04:36 PM, Mark Hellegers wrote: > Hello, > > I have read the developers FAQ which directed me to this mailing list. > I am still using Postgresql on Zeta (descendant of BeOS), but it is > becoming time to upgrade, so I installed Haiku (open source > reimplementation of BeOS) on another machine and downloaded the 9.2.1 > source of Postgresql. > I used an older version of Postgresql which still contained the BeOS > support to see what needed to be done to get 9.2.1 working on Haiku. > Now that I have Postgresql running (with some issues I am still > investigating), I would like to create patches to get Haiku support > added to the official tree of Postgresql. > I do have some questions before I submit a patch: > - Assuming all patches are applied to get Postgresql running, what does > it require to keep it in there? I noticed you removed the BeOS port, > because no one was maintaining it. What does it take to maintain a > port? > - Can I submit patches for smaller parts or do I need to submit all the > patches in one go? For example, can I submit the patch for the > configure part first and other changes later? > - I have a problem compiling Postgresql after I installed iodbc. Iodbc > also contains a header called sqltypes.h, which the compiler picks up > before the one in the ecpg include directory as it is in the general > include directory for the system. Is that something someone has seen > before and knows what is wrong? It could be some mistake I made in my > changes. > > I am planning to get the latest sources from git and apply my patches > on that source as I am assuming that is preferred and I don't need > 9.2.1 specifically. > I think we'd only support a new platform prospectively, so yes, use git master. You can submit patches in small parts, but I would really hope that the changes required are not going to be very big, so there's not a lot of point. If they are going to be huge it might in fact make us think twice about the value of supporting it. You will make us a lot more comfortable about supporting Haiku if you will undertake to set up and maintain a buildfarm animal running it. One thing we don't want is new port that we have no way of making sure stays current. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: