Re: Print b-tree tuples
От | Samuel Vogel |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Print b-tree tuples |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50F030AD.1080905@muel-vogel.de обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Print b-tree tuples (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Am 04.01.13 21:26, schrieb Tom Lane: > Samuel Vogel <s@muel-vogel.de> writes: >> I'm trying to print out the tuples in the b-tree nodes for analysis, but >> when iterate over more than the first entry of the tuples (scanKey++), I >> strangely get the error below on query execution: >> ERROR: relation "simpletest" does not exist >> LINE 1: SELECT * FROM simpletest WHERE id = 50; > Is this patch the only thing you changed? The only obvious explanation > for the above error (other than "you fat-fingered the query") seems to > be that you caused index searches in pg_class to fail, but I don't see > how this patch could be affecting the result of _bt_binsrch. Yes, I've switched to a clean master and only applied this patch. If I put the the break, the query works, so it's fine as well. BTW: I just had a discussion if it would make sense, to recreate my test table with a different order, as a b-tree is always dependent on insertion order. But as the b-tree index is newly created in memory after each restart, two different insertion orders (same values) would give me the same b-tree at least after a restart, right? Regards, Samuel
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: