Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50EDB94F.9030503@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf value, shared_buffers (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
Ответы |
Re: proposal: Set effective_cache_size to greater of .conf
value, shared_buffers
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri, > It seems to me that pgfincore has the smarts we need to know about that, > and that Cédric has code and refenrences for making it work on all > platforms we care about (linux, bsd, windows for starters). Well, fincore is Linux-only, and for that matter only more recent versions of linux. It would be great if we could just detect the RAM, but then we *still* have to ask the user if this is a dedicated box or not. > Then we could have a pretty decent snapshot of the information, and > maybe a background worker of some sort would be able to refresh the > information while the server is running. I don't see a background worker as necessary or even desirable; people don't frequently add RAM to their systems. A manually callable command would be completely adequate. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: