Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files
От | Peter Eisentraut |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50EC8B8D.3020804@gmx.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree with log files (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade regression test litters the source tree
with log files
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 1/8/13 4:04 PM, Bruce Momjian wrote: > On Tue, Jan 8, 2013 at 01:08:44PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote: >> In a tree in which I previously ran "make check" in contrib/pg_upgrade: >> >> $ make -s distclean >> $ git status >> # On branch master >> # Untracked files: >> # (use "git add <file>..." to include in what will be committed) >> # >> # contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_1.log >> # contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_12912.log >> # contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_16384.log >> nothing added to commit but untracked files present (use "git add" to track) >> >> Not sure how long this has been happening. > > Those look like files left over from a failed upgrade, or you used > --retain. Does that make sense? Because they are tracked by oid, it > is possible a later successful upgrade would not remove all those files, > bit it should remove contrib/pg_upgrade/pg_upgrade_dump_1.log because it > is "1". I think this came in with the pg_upgrade --jobs option.
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: