Re: pg_upgrade test script creates port conflicts in parallel testing
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade test script creates port conflicts in parallel testing |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50E5CF9F.9030605@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_upgrade test script creates port conflicts in parallel testing (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade test script creates port conflicts in parallel testing
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 01/03/2013 12:58 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > I've been getting complaints lately about failures of parallel builds > of the Fedora Postgres RPMs on the same machine. I just figured out > what's going on: the pg_upgrade regression test script starts test > postmasters using the default value of listen_addresses, which means > that they try to bind to TCP port 50432 on localhost, which means the > test fails if there's more than one concurrent instance. This does > not happen for the main regression tests, nor for any other contrib > module, because pg_regress.c's postmaster-starting code explicitly > sets listen_addresses to empty, so that only the Unix socket is > active. (RPM building in Fedora generally happens in a chroot, so > there is no conflict of Unix sockets - they're not in the same /tmp.) > > pg_upgrade itself also sets listen_addresses to empty; it's only > the test script that hasn't gotten the memo. > > Does anyone have an objection to fixing the pg_upgrade test script > to suppress the TCP socket? > > Should be OK. We can't do that on Windows, though, so please make it conditional so we don't break Mingw buildfarm members. The test script already contains a few Windows variants. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: