Re: Feature Request: pg_replication_master()

Robert,

> In my view, the biggest problem with recovery.conf is that the
> parameters in there are not GUCs, which means that all of the
> infrastructure that we've built for managing GUCs does not work with
> them.  As an example, when we converted recovery.conf to use the same
> lexer that the GUC machinery uses, it allowed recovery.conf values to
> be specified unquoted in the same circumstances where that was already
> possible for postgresql.conf.  But, you still can't use SHOW or
> pg_settings with recovery.conf parameters, and I think pg_ctl reload
> doesn't work either.  If we make these parameters into GUCs, then
> they'll work the same way everything else works.  Even if (as seems
> likely) we end up still needing a trigger file (or a special pg_ctl
> mode) to initiate recovery, I think that's probably a win.

I agree that it would be an improvement, and I would be happy just to
see the parameters become GUCs.

I'm just saying that I'll still be pushing to get rid of the requirement
for recovery.conf in 9.4, that's all.

-- 
Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://pgexperts.com