Re: Coalesce bug ?
От | Adrian Klaver |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Coalesce bug ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50D4E32A.2040906@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Coalesce bug ? (Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Coalesce bug ?
|
Список | pgsql-general |
On 12/21/2012 02:22 PM, Chris Angelico wrote: > On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 3:53 AM, David Johnston <polobo@yahoo.com> wrote: >> Chris Angelico wrote, and David dropped the citation (oops!): >>> By the way, why do you declare your functions as "STRICT IMMUTABLE" >>> and "STRICT VOLATILE"? >> >> Is this a question about the layout of the commands spatially? > > As I understand it, there are three keywords: VOLATILE, STRICT, and > IMMUTABLE. Putting one of those keywords into the declaration flags > the function accordingly; if none is given, VOLATILE is assumed. > > Declaring the function as "STRICT IMMUTABLE" or "STRICT VOLATILE" > seems at best redundant (the word "STRICT" is mere noise), and at > worst confusing (the parser might be interpreting it as "STRICT", not > as the other keyword). Or is there something I'm missing here? Not sure I am following. IMMUTABLE/VOLATILE/STABLE deal with the query optimizer. CALLED ON NULL INPUT/STRICT deal with NULL input behavior. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.2/interactive/sql-createfunction.html > > ChrisA > > -- Adrian Klaver adrian.klaver@gmail.com
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: