Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT
От | Marko Tiikkaja |
---|---|
Тема | Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50D48511.8020001@joh.to обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT
Re: PL/PgSQL STRICT |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 12/21/12 4:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > What is the use-case for this? Currently, the way to do this would be something like: DECLARE _ok bool; BEGIN UPDATE foo .. RETURNING TRUE INTO STRICT _ok; We have a lot of code like this, and I bet others do as well. > Won't this result in the word STRICT > becoming effectively reserved in contexts where it currently is not? It will, which probably is not ideal if it can be avoided. I also considered syntax like INTO STRICT NULL, but that felt a bit ugly. It would be great if someone had any smart ideas about the syntax. Regards, Marko Tiikkaja
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: