Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists?
От | Richard Neill |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50D3D484.6080100@richardneill.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a dedicated partial index exists? (Richard Neill <rn214@richardneill.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: Why does the query planner use two full indexes, when a
dedicated partial index exists?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 21/12/12 02:34, Richard Neill wrote: > > Reindexing only takes a couple of seconds, and restores correctness. > Interestingly, the partial index (after reindexing) is only 16kB in size; whereas the table is 1.1 GB, and the normal single-column indexes are about 250MB in size. In terms of what's physically happening in reality, - tbl_tracker keeps a record of all books that move through the system over a period of one month (at a rate of about 20/second, or 1 million/day), after which they are deleted. - the partial index, tbl_tracker_performance_1_idx tracks only those books which are currently "in flight" - books remain in flight for about 200 seconds as they go round the machine. (While in flight, these have exit_state = NULL) - the partial index is used to overcome a design defect(*) in the sorter machine, namely that it doesn't number each book uniquely, but wraps the parcel_id_code every few hours. Worse, some books can remain on the sorter for several days (if they jam), so the numbering isn't a clean "wraparound", but more like a fragmented (and occasionally lossy) filesystem. - What I'm trying to do is trace the history of the books through the system and assign each one a proper unique id. So, if I see a book with "parcel_id_code = 37", is it a new book (after pid wrap), or is it the same book I saw 1 minute ago, that hasn't exited the sorter? So... is there some way to, for example, set a trigger that will reindex every time the index exceeds 1000 rows? Richard (*)Readers of The Daily WTF might appreciate another curious anomaly: this machine originally had an RS-232 port; it now uses ethernet, but TxD and RxD use different TCP sockets on different network ports!
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: