Re: CommitFest #3 and upcoming schedule
От | Tomas Vondra |
---|---|
Тема | Re: CommitFest #3 and upcoming schedule |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50C4DCAA.4030800@fuzzy.cz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: CommitFest #3 and upcoming schedule (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: CommitFest #3 and upcoming schedule
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9.12.2012 16:56, Simon Riggs wrote: > On 16 November 2012 07:20, Greg Smith <greg@2ndquadrant.com> wrote: > >> Project guidelines now ask each patch submitter to review patches of the >> same number and approximate complexity as they submit. If you've submitted >> some items to the CommitFest, please look at the open list and try to find >> something you can review. > > The deadline for 9.3 is looming and many patches have not yet been reviewed. > > I'm sending a public reminder to all patch authors that they should > review other people's patches if they expect their own to be reviewed. > > Simply put, if you don't help each other by reviewing other patches > then the inevitable result will be your patch will not be neither > reviewed nor committed. IMHO many of the patches that are currently marked as "needs review" and have no reviewers, were actually reviewed or are being discussed thoroughly on the list, but this information was not propagated to the CF page. Not sure how to fix this except for updating patches that I've reviewed and urging the others to do the same. Tomas
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: