Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
От | Boszormenyi Zoltan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50C37C15.2000203@cybertec.at обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework (Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
2012-12-08 15:30 keltezéssel, Andres Freund írta: > On 2012-10-18 22:40:15 +0200, Boszormenyi Zoltan wrote: >> 2012-10-18 20:08 keltezéssel, Tom Lane írta: >>> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes: >>>> Boszormenyi Zoltan escribió: >>>>> this is the latest one, fixing a bug in the accounting >>>>> of per-statement lock timeout handling and tweaking >>>>> some comments. >>>> Tom, are you able to give this patch some more time on this commitfest? >>> I'm still hoping to get to it, but I've been spending a lot of time on >>> bug fixing rather than patch review lately :-(. If you're hoping to >>> close out the current CF soon, maybe we should just slip it to the next >>> one. >> Fine by me. Thanks. > According to this the current state of the patch should be "Ready for > Committer" not "Needs Review" is that right? I changed the state for > now... Thanks. I just tried the patch on current GIT HEAD and gives some offset warnings but no rejects. Also, it compiles without warnings and still works as it should. Should I post a new patch that applies cleanly? Best regards, Zoltán Böszörményi -- ---------------------------------- Zoltán Böszörményi Cybertec Schönig & Schönig GmbH Gröhrmühlgasse 26 A-2700 Wiener Neustadt, Austria Web: http://www.postgresql-support.de http://www.postgresql.at/
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: