Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance]
От | Andrea Suisani |
---|---|
Тема | Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance] |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50C05AF0.1050306@opinioni.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: xfs perform a lot better than ext4 [WAS: Re: Two identical systems, radically different performance] (John Lister <john.lister@kickstone.com>) |
Список | pgsql-performance |
Hi John, On 12/06/2012 09:29 AM, John Lister wrote: > >> on this box: >> >>> in a brief: the box is dell a PowerEdge r720 with 16GB of RAM, >>> the cpu is a Xeon 5620 with 6 core, the OS is installed on a raid >>> (sata disk 7.2k rpm) and the PGDATA is on separate RAID 1 array >>> (sas 15K rpm) and the controller is a PERC H710 (bbwc with a cache >>> of 512 MB). (ubuntu 12.04) >> >> on the same machine with the same configuration, >> having PGDATA on a xfs formatted partition gives me >> a much better TPS. >> >> e.g. pgbench -c 20 -t 5000 gives me 6305 TPS >> (3 runs with "echo 3 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches && /etc/init.d/postgresql-9.2 restart" >> in between). > Hi, I found this interesting as I'm trying to do some benchmarks on my box which is > very similar to the above but I don't believe the tps is any where near what it should be. > Is the 6305 figure from xfs? yes, it is. > I'm assuming that your main data array is just 2 15k sas drives, correct > are you putting the WAL on the data array or is that stored somewhere else? pg_xlog is placed in the data array. > Can I ask what scaling params, sure, I've initialized pgbench db issuing: pgbench -i -s 10 pgbench > etc you used to build the pgbench tables and look at your postgresql.conf file to see if I missed something (offline ifyou wish) those are non default values in postgresql.conf listen_addresses = '*' max_connections = 100 shared_buffers = 3200MB work_mem = 30MB maintenance_work_mem = 800MB synchronous_commit = off full_page_writes = off checkpoint_segments = 40 checkpoint_completion_target = 0.9 random_page_cost = 3.5 effective_cache_size = 10GB log_timezone = 'localtime' stats_temp_directory = 'pg_stat_tmp_ram' autovacuum_naptime = 5min and then OS tweaks: HT bios disabled /sbin/blockdev --setra 8192 /dev/sdb echo deadline > /sys/block/sdb/queue/scheduler vm.swappiness=0 vm.overcommit_memory=2 vm.dirty_ratio=2 vm.dirty_background_ratio=1 kernel.shmmax=3454820352 kernel.shmall=2048341 $PGDATA is on xfs (rw,noatime) tmpfs on /db/9.2/pg_stat_tmp_ram type tmpfs (rw,size=50M,uid=1001,gid=1001) kernel 3.2.0-32-generic Andrea
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: