Re: json accessors
От | Josh Berkus |
---|---|
Тема | Re: json accessors |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50BF973F.8090208@agliodbs.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: json accessors ("David E. Wheeler" <david@justatheory.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: json accessors
Re: json accessors Re: json accessors |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
>> *) xmlpath/jsonpath do searching (and decomposition) but are very >> clunky from sql perspective and probably absolutely nogo in terms if >> GIST/GIN. postgres spiritually wants to do things via operators and >> we should (if possible) at least consider that first Why is it a nogo for GiST? Ltree works, doesn't it? If we only support equality lookups in what way is a JSON doc different from a collection of ltree rows? We'd probably want to use SP-GiST for better index size/performance, but I don't see that this is impossible. Just some difficult code. -- Josh Berkus PostgreSQL Experts Inc. http://pgexperts.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: