Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark?
От | Will Rutherdale (rutherw) |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50A8E1F8D9122546A7F67134915EDB7A3B8E3A@xmb-rtp-21a.amer.cisco.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Is there a meaningful benchmark? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
Point taken. Thank you for the help. -Will -----Original Message----- From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us] Sent: 20 March 2009 12:06 To: Will Rutherdale (rutherw) Cc: pgsql-general@postgresql.org Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Is there a meaningful benchmark? "Will Rutherdale (rutherw)" <rutherw@cisco.com> writes: > However, keeping the KISS principle in mind, you can create a benchmark > that simply sets up a sample database and forks off a bunch of processes > to do random updates for an hour, say. Dead simple. Indeed, and more than likely dead useless. The only benchmark that really counts is one's live application, which is probably not update-only and probably has a fairly non-random update pattern too. What people have been trying to point out to you is that you can certainly measure *something* with a benchmark test that has no thought behind it, but it's not clear whether the numbers you come up with will have any real-world value. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: