Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
От | Mark Kirkwood |
---|---|
Тема | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 509AD0AB.5010109@catalyst.net.nz обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ? (David Boreham <david_list@boreham.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: HT on or off for E5-26xx ?
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 08/11/12 02:33, David Boreham wrote: > On 11/6/2012 9:16 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote: >> >> >> I've been benchmarking a E5-4640 (4 socket) and hyperthreading off >> gave much better scaling behaviour in pgbench (gentle rise and >> flatten off), whereas with hyperthreading on there was a dramatic >> falloff after approx number clients = number of (hyperthreaded) cpus. >> The box is intended to be a pure db server, so we are running with >> hyperthreading off. > > It looks like this syndrome is not observed on my box, likely due to > the much lower number of cores system-wide (12). > I see pgbench tps increase nicely until #threads/clients == #cores, > then plateau. I tested up to 96 threads btw. > > We're waiting on more memory modules to arrive. I'll post some test > results once we have all 4 memory banks populated. > > > > Interesting - I was wondering if a single socket board would behave differently (immediately after posting of course)...I've got an i3 home system that scales nicely even with hyperthreading on (2 cores, 4 typerthreads). Cheers Mark
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: