Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?
От | damien clochard |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5098F401.1010303@dalibo.info обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? (Gabriele Bartolini <gabriele.bartolini@2ndQuadrant.it>) |
Ответы |
Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day?
Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? Re: Rough estimate of number of downloads per year/month/day? |
Список | pgsql-advocacy |
I agree with Josh : the number of downloads is not relevant for us. Just like the "market share" estimations always fail to demonstrate PostgreSQL presence in the industry. However we need to provide numbers to represent the growth of our user base. There's tons of blogs saying that PostgreSQL is wonderful but when MySQL announces 70000 downloads/day or when Oracle says they own 50% of the market, we are speechless because we don't have anything to oppose to this. I thinks we need to define new metrics to monitor the evolution of the project in the industry. It's not easy but there must some way to mesure that. For example, the job trends or ML traffic could be more informative that the download numbers... http://www.indeed.com/jobtrends?q=postgres%2C++oracle&l=&relative=1 http://markmail.blogspot.fr/2008/02/postgresql-more-traffic-than-mysql-and.html Any other ideas ?
В списке pgsql-advocacy по дате отправления: