Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50855EDD.4050705@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Successor of MD5 authentication, let's use SCRAM
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 10/22/2012 10:18 AM, Robert Haas wrote: > On Sun, Oct 21, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Martijn van Oosterhout > <kleptog@svana.org> wrote: >> It bugs me every time you have to jump through hoops and get red >> warnings for an unknown CA, whereas no encryption whatsoever is treated >> as fine while being actually even worse. > +1. Amen, brother. > Not really, IMNSHO. The difference is that an unencrypted session isn't pretending to be secure. In any case, it doesn't seem too intrusive for us to warn, at least in psql, with something like: SSL connection (cipher: DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA, bits: 256) Host Certificate Unverified If people want to get more paranoid they can always set PGSSLMODE to verify-ca or verify-full. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: