Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type
От | Vik Fearing |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 507f399f-e21f-e20e-0090-710de187a662@postgresfriends.org обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Allow deleting enumerated values from an existing enumerated data type
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 9/29/23 03:17, Tom Lane wrote: > Vik Fearing <vik@postgresfriends.org> writes: >> On 9/28/23 20:46, Tom Lane wrote: >>> We went through all these points years ago when the enum feature >>> was first developed, as I recall. Nobody thought that the ability >>> to remove an enum value was worth the amount of complexity it'd >>> entail. > >> This issue comes up regularly (although far from often). Do we want to >> put some comments right where would-be implementors would be sure to see it? > > Perhaps. I'd be kind of inclined to leave the "yet" out of "not yet > implemented" in the error message, as that wording sounds like we just > haven't got round to it. I see your point, but should we be dissuading people who might want to work on solving those problems? I intentionally did not document that this syntax exists so the only people seeing the message are those who just try it, and those wanting to write a patch like Danil did. No one except you has said anything about this patch. I think it would be good to commit it, wordsmithing aside. -- Vik Fearing
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: