Re: citext question
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: citext question |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 507A35F1.8060809@ringerc.id.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | citext question (Heine Ferreira <heine.ferreira@gmail.com>) |
Список | pgsql-general |
On 10/14/2012 05:48 AM, Heine Ferreira wrote: > Hi > > I have played around a bit with the citext > extention. It looks like it is a lot like the > text data type - allmost like a memo > field. Is there any way to restrict the > length of citext fields, like char and > varchar fields? First, don't use "char(n)" or plain "char". Neither do what you (as a sane and sensible person) probably expect them to do. In PostgreSQL, "varchar(n)" is effectively the same as "text" with a "length(col_name) <= n" CHECK constraint. There is no difference in how they are stored, and there's no advantage to using "varchar" over "text". It's similar with citext. While citext doesn't accept a typmod to constrain its length, you can and should use CHECK constraints as appropriate in your data definitions. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: