Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5078.1011815834@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects (Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org>) |
Ответы |
Re: RFD: schemas and different kinds of Postgres objects
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
Bill Studenmund <wrstuden@netbsd.org> writes: > One of the things schemas have to support is essentially a PATH specifier. Yes, but... > So all we need to do is have all of the schemas created in a new DB have > path specifiers pulling in all of the other schemas. Thus we can make a > schema-savy system act as if it has only one namespace. When you create a new user, do all those path specifiers for the existing users magically update themselves? Seems like maintenance would be a pain. Fernando's "any" idea is probably a cleaner way to handle it if we wanted to do things like that. But I still think it'll be safer and more controllable if we provide a "public" namespace instead; see followup discussions. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: