Re: Behavior for crash recovery when it detects a corrupt WAL record
| От | Heikki Linnakangas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Behavior for crash recovery when it detects a corrupt WAL record |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 50742FB9.7040906@vmware.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Behavior for crash recovery when it detects a corrupt WAL record (Amit Kapila <amit.kapila@huawei.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Behavior for crash recovery when it detects a corrupt WAL record
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09.10.2012 16:42, Amit Kapila wrote: > I have observed that currently during recovery, while it applies the WAL > records even if it detects that there is a corrupt record > > by crc validation, it proceeds. > > Basically ReadRecord(), returns NULL in such cases which makes the behavior > same as it has reached end of WAL. > > After that server get started and user can perform operations normally. Yeah. We rely on the CRC to detect end of WAL during recovery. If the system crashes while the WAL is being flushed to disk, it's normal that there's a corrupt (ie. partially written) record at the end of the WAL. This is a common technique used by pretty much every system with a transaction log / journal. The other option would be to perform two fsyncs for every commit; one to flush the WAL to disk, and another to update some global pointer to point to the end of valid WAL (e.g in pg_control). - Heikki
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: