Re: xpath processing brain dead
От | James Pye |
---|---|
Тема | Re: xpath processing brain dead |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5072C04B-048D-44F6-AF9C-B321CC8E69C8@jwp.name обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: xpath processing brain dead (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: xpath processing brain dead
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Feb 26, 2009, at 5:41 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> http://www.exslt.org/exsl/functions/node-set/index.html > > A node-set isn't a document. yes.. :) I guess what I'm saying is that if: tinman=# SELECT XML'<foo/><bar/>'; xml -------------- <foo/><bar/> (1 row) is considered to be valid per *SQL-XML*, then it should probably be treated as a node-set in the context of xpath, not mangled with <x>...</x>.. Certainly, I would expect an implicit "node-set() call" long before wrapping the fragment in <x>...</x> and prefixing my xpath query. However, I find the validity of the above, XML'<foo/><bar/>', a bit disturbing to begin with. :P > In any case, this functionality doesn't appear to be in libxml2, > it's in libxslt according to the reference you provided. I think that's *just* referencing the list of xslt implementations that the extension function is known to be available in.. I doubt that means to imply that the function or equivalent functionality is not available in libxml2 itself. I'd wager that equivalent functionality could be implemented if it weren't directly/already available.. =)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: