Re: Deadlocks ?
От | kevin kempter |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Deadlocks ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 506ECCFC-6568-4CD3-B4AF-25A860D97859@kevinkempterllc.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Deadlocks ? (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: Deadlocks ?
|
Список | pgsql-admin |
On May 13, 2008, at 5:00 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Tino Schwarze <postgresql@tisc.de> writes: >> On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 01:18:24PM -0600, kevin kempter wrote: >> ProgrammingError: deadlock detected >> DETAIL: Process 23098 waits for ShareUpdateExclusiveLock on >> relation 428126 of database 427376; blocked by process 23916. >> Process 23916 waits for ShareLock on transaction 46802680; blocked >> by process 23098. > >> I've never figured out how to resolve the "lock on transaction" to >> something understandable... > > It's presumably waiting for a row lock that the other transaction > has got. We don't keep enough information about row locks in memory > to give a better error message (because we could run out of memory > if we tried :-() > > regards, tom lane > If that's true does it make sense to play with a timeout value (I assume the timeout is configurable somewhere in postgresql.conf) in an effort to tune for this ? /Kevin > -- > Sent via pgsql-admin mailing list (pgsql-admin@postgresql.org) > To make changes to your subscription: > http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-admin
В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления: