Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50676D83.8050000@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_upgrade tests vs alter generic changes
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 09/29/2012 01:49 PM, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > On 09/29/2012 11:49 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >>> The recent alter generic tests have broken pg_upgrade testing on >>> Windows >>> and probably other non-collation-supporting platforms. >> Is it still broken after Alvaro added the alternate expected file, and >> if so why? I don't see a reason that this should be failing only there. >> I also note that it seems to be passing fine on buildfarm members other >> than pitta. > > Well, that's a very good point. chough is actually the same machine, > doing an MSVC build. So why would this test pass there? I'll > investigate a bit more. Here's what the regression diffs look like > when run from pg_upgrade on pitta: [hours of digging later] It turns out that the reason is that we support collations on MSVC but not on Mingw. *sigh* I'll have to put it on my ever lengthening TODO list. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: