Re: max_fsm_pages >800k ... ?
От | John Hansen |
---|---|
Тема | Re: max_fsm_pages >800k ... ? |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5066E5A966339E42AA04BA10BA706AE50A934D@rodrick.geeknet.com.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | max_fsm_pages >800k ... ? ("Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@postgresql.org>) |
Список | pgsql-hackers |
INFO: analyzing "pg_catalog.pg_depend" INFO: "pg_depend": 27 pages, 3866 rows sampled, 3866 estimated total rows INFO: free space map: 423 relations, 88475 pages stored; 431200 total pages needed DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 4000 relations + 80000 pages = 705 kB shared memory. This, on a database with a moderate amount of rows (<10 Million) So,.. I'd say fairly normal. ... John > -----Original Message----- > From: pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org > [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Marc > G. Fournier > Sent: Thursday, June 16, 2005 3:57 AM > To: pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org > Subject: [HACKERS] max_fsm_pages >800k ... ? > > > Without more information to provide at this time, does the > following seem "unusual"? > > INFO: free space map: 252 relations, 411494 pages stored; > 738640 total pages needed > DETAIL: Allocated FSM size: 2000 relations + 400000 pages = > 2463 kB shared memory. > > I know there are alot of factors involved in the above, which > I'm looking into, but when I first saw the above, I just > about had a heartattack, only because i've never seen such > high #s for total pages needed ... > > ... Is this something that others are seeing as relatively normal? > > > > > ---- > Marc G. Fournier Hub.Org Networking Services > (http://www.hub.org) > Email: scrappy@hub.org Yahoo!: yscrappy > ICQ: 7615664 > > ---------------------------(end of > broadcast)--------------------------- > TIP 8: explain analyze is your friend > >
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: