Re: Same query doing slow then quick
От | Julien Cigar |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Same query doing slow then quick |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50630E6F.5040605@ulb.ac.be обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Same query doing slow then quick (FFW_Rude <FFW_Rude@hotmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Same query doing slow then quick
Re: Same query doing slow then quick |
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 09/26/2012 16:14, FFW_Rude wrote: > Thank for you answer. > > shared_buffer is at 24Mb > effective_cache_size at 2048Mb > > What do you mean properly ? That's not really helping a novice... > from my previous mail: before looking further, please configure shared_buffers and effective_cache_size properly, it's fundamental you'll probably need to raise SHMALL/SHMMAX, take a look at: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/kernel-resources.html for 4GB of RAM I would start with shared_buffers to 512MB and effective_cache_size to 2GB > > > -- > View this message in context: http://postgresql.1045698.n5.nabble.com/Same-query-doing-slow-then-quick-tp5725486p5725505.html > Sent from the PostgreSQL - performance mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- No trees were killed in the creation of this message. However, many electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
Вложения
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: