Re: Configuration include directory

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Heikki Linnakangas
Тема Re: Configuration include directory
Дата
Msg-id 50601C9D.8000806@vmware.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Configuration include directory  (Selena Deckelmann <selena@chesnok.com>)
Ответы Re: Configuration include directory  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 21.09.2012 00:10, Selena Deckelmann wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I've spent a little time with this patch and have attached revision 6.
>   Thanks, Noah, for a fantastically detailed review.
>
> The only thing I didn't do that Noah suggested was run pgindent on
> guc-file.l. A cursory search did not reveal source compatible with my
> operating system for 'indent'. If someone points me to it, I'd happily
> also comply with the request to reindent. And document how to do that
> on my platform(s). :)
>
> I did just remove the references to the Apache project etc. I agree
> that providing best practices is good, but I'm skeptical about
> including best practices piecemeal. Adding it to earlier tutorial
> sections would probably be a bit more visible IMO.

This seems pretty much ready to commit. One tiny detail that I'd like to 
clarify: the docs say:

> Multiple files within an include directory are ordered by an alphanumeric sorting, so that ones beginning with
numbersare considered before those starting with letters.
 

To be more precise, the patch uses strcmp() for the comparisons. That's 
also what apache seems to do, although I couldn't find it being 
mentioned explicitly in their docs. It's true that numbers are sorted 
before letters, but should we also mention that upper-case letters are 
sorted before lower-case ones, and that sorting of non-ASCII characters 
depends on the encoding, in often surprising ways? Is there a better 
term for what strcmp() does? ASCII order? Is there precedence somewhere 
else in the PostgreSQL codebase or docs for that?

- Heikki



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Boszormenyi Zoltan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [PATCH] lock_timeout and common SIGALRM framework
Следующее
От: Kohei KaiGai
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [v9.3] writable foreign tables