Re: Startup parameters timezone conversion
От | Tom Lane |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Startup parameters timezone conversion |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 505670.1642604879@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Startup parameters timezone conversion ("David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Startup parameters timezone conversion
|
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
"David G. Johnston" <david.g.johnston@gmail.com> writes: > Indeed I presume it is. I wonder whether a carefully chosen timezone > specification on the server would cause this to break since the server can > be made to report the offset using either convention and so at least for > some timezone specifications the flipping of the sign would not be required… AFAIK, "reporting the offset" is always done with the ISO convention. It's only when trying to interpret a time zone specification that we consider the POSIX convention (and that's mostly because the underlying tzdb code does so). This does lead to fun stuff like postgres=# set timezone = 'GMT+2'; -- read as POSIX zone spec SET postgres=# select now(); now ------------------------------- 2022-01-19 13:03:36.000152-02 -- report as ISO (1 row) postgres=# set timezone = '+2'; -- read as numeric ISO offset SET postgres=# select now(); now ------------------------------- 2022-01-19 17:03:41.722767+02 -- report as ISO (1 row) IMO, all these cases are best-avoided legacy conventions. In practice you should set the timezone using the tzdb zone name for where you live, e.g. America/New_York. regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: