Re: _FORTIFY_SOURCE by default?

On 09/16/2012 12:41 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 appears to be the default for package building on many
>> Linux distributions now, as part of harding or security options.  But we
>> often hear about problems related to this only when we hand the source
>> over to the packagers.  So I think we might as well add this to our
>> standard compilation options, for example in src/include/port/linux.h.
>> What do you think?
> Doesn't seem like a good idea to me to add platform-specific options
> with unspecified effects to platform-independent upstream sources.
>
> To the extent that this option finds anything useful (which in my
> experience is a negligibly small percentage anyway), it's the
> responsibility of the packagers (including me) to report it.
>
>             


Might be worth having a buildfarm animal or two building with it, say by 
setting CFLAGS before configure?

cheers

andrew