Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 5055D7FF.2070908@ringerc.id.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Are there known performance issues with defining all Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate ("McKinzie, Alan (Alan)" <alanmck@avaya.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: Are there known performance issues with defining all
Foreign Keys as deferrable initially immediate
|
Список | pgsql-performance |
On 09/14/2012 11:56 PM, McKinzie, Alan (Alan) wrote: > My underlying question/concern is "will this change have any adverse > affects (on performance) during normal operations when the foreign keys > are set to deferrable initially immediate" .vs. the foreign keys being > defined as NOT DEFERRABLE. AFAIK in PostgreSQL DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE is different to NOT DEFERRABLE. DEFERRABLE INITIALLY IMMEDIATE is executed at the end of the statement, while NOT DEFERRABLE is executed as soon as it arises. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/sql-set-constraints.html http://stackoverflow.com/questions/10032272/constraint-defined-deferrable-initially-immediate-is-still-deferred Again from memory there's a performance cost to deferring constraint checks to the end of the statement rather than doing them as soon as they arise, so NOT DEFERRED can potentially perform better or at least not hit limits that DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED might hit in Pg. This seems under-documented and I haven't found much good info on it, so the best thing to do is test it. -- Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: