Re: pg_upgrade from 9.1.3 to 9.2 failed

于 2012/9/15 2:39, Bruce Momjian 写道:
> On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:53:38PM +0800, Rural Hunter wrote:
>>>> Performing Upgrade
>>>> ------------------
>>>> Analyzing all rows in the new cluster                       ok
>>>> Freezing all rows on the new cluster                        ok
>>>> Deleting files from new pg_clog                             ok
>>>> Copying old pg_clog to new server                           ok
>>>> Setting next transaction ID for new cluster                 ok
>>>> Resetting WAL archives                                      ok
>>>> Setting frozenxid counters in new cluster                   ok
>>>> Creating databases in the new cluster                       ok
>>>> Adding support functions to new cluster                     ok
>>>> Restoring database schema to new cluster                    ok
>>>> Removing support functions from new cluster                 ok
>>>> Copying user relation files
>>>>    /raid/pgsql/base/6087920/6088238
>>>> old and new databases "testdb" have a different number of relations
>>>> Failure, exiting
>>> That is an odd failure.  That check was added in PG 9.1 and this is the
>>> first time I am seeing this failure.
>>>
>>> The check is to make sure that once we have created all the user schema
>>> details in the new cluster, that there are the same number of objects in
>>> the new and old databases.
>>>
>>> Obviously there are a different number in your case here, but I don't
>>> know why those would be different, and in fact, because we have never
>>> hit this, there isn't even any debug output that shows the source of the
>>> difference.
>>>
>>> If I send you a patch can you compile it and send back the debug output
>>> it produces?
>>>
>> Yes sure, I will try to compile and retest with it.
> Actually, I have a simpler idea.  At the point where it fails, you can
> run pg_dump --schema-only on the testdb database in the old and new
> cluster and then diff those output files and email the result to us;  it
> should show the mismatch.  I am not sure if the dumps will output the
> objects in the same order, it might.
>
diff attached.