Re: build farm machine using mixed results

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Andrew Dunstan
Тема Re: build farm machine using mixed results
Дата
Msg-id 504CB24B.70308@dunslane.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: build farm machine using mixed results  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 09/09/2012 03:29 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> On Sat, 2012-09-08 at 19:54 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> Anyway, what I notice is that I get different types of failures, but
>>> they are all under ecpg/.  What I think we need to do is insert
>>> .NOTPARALLEL in ecpg/Makefile,
>> I'd hate that, because the ecpg build is one of the slowest parts of the
>> build, so de-parallelizing it would slow down everything quite a bit.
> There's only one bit of it that's slow, which is the bison build +
> preproc.c compile, which is necessarily serial anyway.  So I think
> trying to avoid .NOTPARALLEL there is a complete waste of effort.
> But if you wanna fix it some other way, step right up.


Yeah. I am going to add a config parameter to the buildfarm to allow 
parallelism for the "make" and "make contrib" stages, but I'm not going 
to release it until this is fixed.

(I suppose this is also a lesson to me that I should not ignore things 
like this that annoy me persistently as I did with these failures until 
Robert Creager started this discussion. It just didn't seem important 
enough.)

cheers

andrew





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Amit kapila
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proof of concept: standalone backend with full FE/BE protocol