Re: Streaming bytea implementation offered
От | Craig Ringer |
---|---|
Тема | Re: Streaming bytea implementation offered |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50429596.5070906@ringerc.id.au обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: Streaming bytea implementation offered (Werner Donné <werner.donne@pincette.biz>) |
Список | pgsql-jdbc |
On 09/01/2012 11:13 PM, Werner Donné wrote:
That's reasonable, especially if we log the fact at debug/trace level too, to encourage people to turn the feature off if it doesn't apply in their environment.We will have to fall back on copying the byte array in case a temporary file couldn't be created, for whatever reason.
I think it'll need to be, if nothing else to stop people from having tempfile issues.Do you propose to make this always-on, or configurable?The treashold could be configurable.
I suspected not, but it's good to confirm. Thanks.How (if at all) does this interact with JDBC-standard BLOB support, and with large objects?It has no effect on either.
I have never used git, nor have I written unit tests, but I'll have a look.
If you've used any SCM like CVS, Subversion, or Perforce the principles are similar for basic use. I highly recommend it. This'll be handy:
https://help.github.com/
GitHub have spent a lot of time and effort writing documentation and tutorials for git.
Sorry to ask you to do that; I'd probably just grab the source tarball and pick through it, but I'm on a travelling holiday for the next couple of weeks and just trying to check in on the mailing list sometimes.
--
Craig Ringer
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: