Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
От | Andrew Dunstan |
---|---|
Тема | Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch |
Дата | |
Msg-id | 50415864.9080103@dunslane.net обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>) |
Ответы |
Re: _USE_32BIT_TIME_T Patch
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On 08/31/2012 06:39 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes: >> I'm not sure what we need to do to progress on this, especially re the >> back branches. > The calendar might help us here. 9.2 is due to wrap next week, but it > will likely be a couple of months before we contemplate new back-branch > releases. So we could push a fix that we don't have 100% confidence in, > knowing that there is time to recover before it will ship in any of the > proven branches. Releasing it in 9.2.0 will afford an opportunity for > more testing than we can do by ourselves. > > That's not to take anything away from the fact that we ought to test as > many cases as we can now. But we do have some margin for error. > > OK, so I have tested it on my 32bit setup and it's working, so I'm going to commit this for HEAD/9.2 now, so we can get that wider testing. cheers andrew
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: